Without a medical indication, do not ask for a cesarean, and do not schedule surgery to pick a date
UpdatedGrade AMedium benefitLifespanFreeLittle timeSome willpower
The World Health Organization’s position is that once a place’s cesarean rate passes 10%, there is no evidence that deaths of mothers and newborns keep falling. When a cesarean is needed, it must be done. Choosing a date or avoiding pain as the reason means taking on one more major abdominal operation.
- Cost
- No money spent. The hard part is standing up to what people at home say
- Benefit
- WHO statement in 2015: when the cesarean rate in a population rises to about 10%, maternal and newborn deaths fall. Above 10%, there is no evidence that mortality improves further. WHO also stresses that every effort should be made to provide cesareans to women who need them, not to hit a particular rate
- Notes
- When medicine truly requires it, a cesarean is life-saving — do it; do not tough it out. What to avoid is surgery when medicine does not require it, for example fear of pain, picking an auspicious time, or gaming the child’s school-entry age. A cesarean is a major abdominal operation. One pooled comparison of cesarean with vaginal birth found that after a cesarean, in a later pregnancy placenta previa OR 1.74, about 70% higher; placenta accreta OR 2.95, about 3 times; placental abruption OR 1.38; stillbirth OR 1.27. That directly affects whether you want a second child. On the other side, people who had a cesarean later have less urine leakage and pelvic organ prolapse. These all come from follow-up record studies; the authors say you cannot conclude from them that the cesarean caused the difference
Sources · 2
- World Health Organization (2015). WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates(WHO/RHR/15.02). who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-RHR-15.02
- Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ (2018). Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 15(1), e1002494. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494